Carli Judice mma record: 2026 Stats & Fight Results

The clearest available record listing places Carli Judice at 7-2-0. That format represents seven wins, two losses, and no draws. The record should be read as a current database snapshot rather than a complete career narrative, because individual bout details can change as athletic commissions, promotions, or statistical services update their records.

The same profile lists Judice as a 115-pound fighter with a southpaw stance, a 5-foot-7 height, and a 68-inch reach. Those measurements provide useful context when evaluating her performances, especially against opponents who may have different ranges or tactical preferences.

Video Highlights:

• Amateur title-fight footage provides an example of Judice competing under championship-round pressure.
• Corner instructions emphasize breathing, head movement, hand position, and staying composed.
• The bout offers useful film-study material for evaluating pace and defensive reactions.

The most important distinction is between the headline record and the detailed fight log. The headline gives the broad result, while the bout table explains how individual wins were achieved. For Judice, the available entries include both a first-round KO/TKO victory and a unanimous-decision win, showing more than one route to victory.

The available 2026 fight entries show two wins. One came against Jeisla Chaves at UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues, while the other came against Juliana Miller at UFC Fight Night: Strickland vs. Hernandez.

The Chaves bout is listed as a first-round KO/TKO victory by kick at 1:39. The recorded significant-strike totals favor Judice, 16 to 10, and the entry lists no takedowns or submissions. The Miller bout is listed as a three-round unanimous decision, with Judice holding a 79-36 significant-strike advantage. The same entry records two takedowns for Miller and none for Judice, making the striking differential especially important to the result.

These results point to two different competitive patterns:

• Finishing threat: The Chaves entry shows a fast stoppage and a kick listed as the winning technique.
• Round-by-round output: The Miller entry shows Judice producing a much larger significant-strike total across three rounds.
• Tactical resilience: The Miller statistics indicate that Judice won despite the opponent recording two takedowns.
• Decision experience: A unanimous-decision win demonstrates that her success is not limited to an early finish.

For readers comparing the results, method matters as much as the opponent name. A first-round stoppage reflects finishing efficiency, while a decision win gives more information about pace, volume, recovery, and sustained execution.

For the official statistical listing, consult the Carli Judice record and statistics page on UFCStats. The page is the best reference for checking later changes to the record or detailed bout rows.

Judice’s available career statistics describe a fighter with strong striking volume and useful takedown defense. The profile lists 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute, 50% striking accuracy, and 6.62 significant strikes absorbed per minute. Her significant-strike defense is listed at 57%.

The grappling numbers are more specific. Judice is credited with a 0.52 takedown average per 15 minutes, 25% takedown accuracy, and 80% takedown defense. Her submission average is listed as 0.0, so the available data does not present submissions as a central statistical feature of her record.

These figures should not be treated as standalone rankings. Significant strikes landed per minute can increase in high-tempo fights, while absorbed strikes may vary with opponent style and time spent in exchanges. Likewise, an 80% takedown-defense number is valuable context, but it does not guarantee that every matchup will remain standing.

The most useful combined reading is volume plus defense. A fighter who lands at a high rate while defending takedowns effectively can build a clear striking-based game plan. However, the Miller entry shows why defensive statistics still need fight-specific context: the opponent recorded two takedowns in that bout even though Judice earned the decision.

A reliable fight analysis should move from the record to the individual performance. Start with the official result, identify the winning method, and then compare the statistical story with what happened during each round. This approach avoids reducing a fighter to a single number.

When studying the available amateur title-fight footage, focus on practical details rather than trying to infer an entire career identity from one bout. The corner repeatedly emphasizes breathing, keeping the hands up, moving the head away from the center line, and staying relaxed. Those are useful film-study checkpoints for any striking performance.

The available profile supports a clear but measured assessment. Judice is listed as a southpaw at 115 pounds, with a 68-inch reach and a 5-foot-7 height. Her statistical profile is led by striking volume, while her defensive numbers suggest meaningful resistance to both strikes and takedowns.

The main limitation is the size of the available detail. The headline record is clear, and two 2026 fight rows are available, but those rows do not represent every possible bout statistic or every phase of Judice’s career. Readers should avoid using the partial table to calculate a new record, finishing percentage, or complete opponent history.

The safest summary is that Judice’s listed profile combines a southpaw stance, active striking output, and solid takedown-defense numbers. Her available 2026 results also show versatility in method: she can win by an early kick stoppage or by maintaining enough output to earn a unanimous decision.