- Primary keyword: Carli Judice average significant strikes from two listed 2026 fights
- Average landed: She recorded 47.5 significant strikes landed per listed fight
- Average attempted: The listed sample shows 110 significant strike attempts per fight
- Accuracy: Her combined significant-strike accuracy across those fights was 43.18%
- Best context: Target splits and fight length matter when interpreting the average
Carli Judice average significant strikes
The available 2026 striking records list two Carli Judice fights: a February 21 win over Juliana Miller and an August 22 win over Jeisla Chaves. Across those entries, Judice landed 95 significant strikes from 220 attempts. That produces a 47.5 landed-significant-strikes average per listed fight.
This is a listed-fight sample average, not a claim about her full career average. The ESPN table identifies Judice’s overall record as 7-2-0, while the displayed striking section contains these two detailed rows. Keeping that distinction clear prevents a recent-sample calculation from being mistaken for a complete career statistic.
Video Highlights:
- A third-round finish against Jeisla Chaves
- Repeated knees to the body and head
- A liver shot that ended the contest at 1:30 of round three
- Judice’s explanation of the technique and her training preparation
| Metric | Juliana Miller | Jeisla Chaves | Listed-fight average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Significant strikes landed | 79 | 16 | 47.5 |
| Significant strikes attempted | 185 | 35 | 110 |
| Significant-strike accuracy | 42.70% | 45.71% | 43.18% combined |
| Total strikes landed | 104 | 16 | 60 |
| Total strikes attempted | 214 | 35 | 124.5 |
| Knockdowns | 0 | 1 | 0.5 |
The most important takeaway is the difference in fight volume. Against Miller, Judice landed 79 significant strikes and attempted 185. Against Chaves, she landed 16 from 35 attempts, but scored one knockdown and finished the bout. A lower single-fight total does not automatically indicate a weaker performance when the contest ends early.
Use 47.5 as a simple average of the two displayed fight rows. For opponent comparisons, also review attempts, accuracy, fight duration, and finishing sequence.
How the 2026 average is calculated
The calculation uses the significant-strike columns labeled SSL and SSA in the published table. SSL means significant strikes landed, while SSA means significant strikes attempted. The average is calculated by adding the two listed fight totals and dividing by two.
| Calculation | Formula | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Average landed | (79 + 16) ÷ 2 | 47.5 |
| Average attempted | (185 + 35) ÷ 2 | 110 |
| Combined accuracy | (79 + 16) ÷ (185 + 35) | 43.18% |
| Average landed per attempt | 95 ÷ 220 | 0.432 strikes |
The combined accuracy is more informative than averaging the two displayed percentages directly. Judice’s individual accuracy figures are 42.70% against Miller and 45.71% against Chaves. Weighting each bout by its attempt volume gives the combined rate of 43.18%.
Fight-by-fight breakdown
| Date | Opponent | Result | Significant strikes | Accuracy | Knockdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 21, 2026 | Juliana Miller | Win | 79 of 185 | 42.70% | 0 |
| August 22, 2026 | Jeisla Chaves | Win | 16 of 35 | 45.71% | 1 |
The Miller bout contributed most of the sample’s volume. It accounts for 79 of Judice’s 95 listed significant strikes landed and 185 of 220 attempts. The Chaves bout contributed less volume because the contest ended at 1:30 of the third round after Judice’s finishing sequence.
What “significant strikes” means here
The table separates significant strikes from total strikes. Significant strikes are further organized by distance, clinch, and ground position. The records also provide target categories, including body, head, and leg attacks.
That structure matters because a fighter can have a modest overall total while producing decisive damage in a specific area. Judice’s Chaves performance is a clear example: the available interview emphasizes knees and a liver shot, while the statistics show one knockdown and a stoppage win.
The available rows do not support a complete seven-fight career average. Label this figure as the average from the two detailed 2026 fights shown in the striking table.
Target and position breakdown
Judice’s listed significant-strike data shows how her offense was distributed across distance, clinch, and ground positions. In both displayed fights, distance striking supplied most of the recorded significant-strike volume.
| Fight | Distance landed | Clinch landed | Ground landed | Total significant landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juliana Miller | 79 | 3 | 1 | 83 listed positional strikes |
| Jeisla Chaves | 16 | 2 | 2 | 20 listed positional strikes |
The positional categories should be treated as a breakdown of the listed significant-strike fields. The table’s headline SSL value is 79 for Miller and 16 for Chaves, while the distance, clinch, and ground rows provide additional location detail. The available data may present category fields differently from the headline total, so the headline SSL and SSA figures remain the correct values for the average calculation.
Target percentages
| Fight | Body target | Head target | Leg target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juliana Miller | 59% | 37% | 75% |
| Jeisla Chaves | 70% | 36% | 0% |
The target percentages indicate that body work was prominent in both listed entries. Chaves shows a particularly strong body-target figure at 70%, matching the finishing narrative centered on a damaging knee to the body and a liver shot.
These percentages should not be added together. They describe target breakdowns within their respective statistical categories rather than mutually exclusive portions of one universal total. Use them to identify emphasis, not to reconstruct a separate strike count.
Volume
79 of 185 significant strikes landed against Miller. This fight drives most of the listed average.
Efficiency
Judice’s combined listed-fight accuracy is 43.18% across 220 significant-strike attempts.
Body Work
Body-target figures were 59% against Miller and 70% against Chaves.
Impact
The Chaves entry includes one knockdown and a third-round stoppage.
Pair strike volume with impact indicators. Judice’s Chaves statistics show fewer landed strikes, but the knockdown and stoppage explain the fight’s decisive outcome.
Step-by-step method for comparing fights
Use the following process when reviewing Judice’s significant-strike numbers or comparing them with another fighter’s record.
Identify the correct columns
Start with SSL for significant strikes landed and SSA for significant strikes attempted. Do not substitute total strikes unless the comparison specifically concerns all recorded strikes.
Record each displayed fight
Write down the date, opponent, result, SSL, SSA, accuracy, and knockdowns. For the current listed sample, the rows are Miller and Chaves in 2026.
Calculate the simple average
Add the landed totals and divide by the number of displayed fights. For Judice, (79 + 16) ÷ 2 equals 47.5 landed significant strikes.
Calculate the combined rate
Add all landed strikes, add all attempts, and divide landed by attempts. The current result is 95 ÷ 220, or 43.18%.
Add context before drawing a conclusion
Review fight length, target breakdown, position, knockdowns, and result. An early finish can create a lower strike total while still representing a highly effective performance.
Comparison framework
| Question | Why it matters | Judice sample |
|---|---|---|
| How many landed? | Measures completed significant offense | 95 across two listed fights |
| How many attempted? | Shows offensive volume | 220 across two listed fights |
| What was the accuracy? | Adds efficiency context | 43.18% combined |
| Was there a knockdown? | Indicates a major impact event | 1 against Chaves |
| Did the bout end early? | Explains unusually low totals | Chaves ended at 1:30 of round three |
Averages are most useful when the underlying fights are similar in duration. Miller and Chaves are not identical samples: one produced a larger volume of recorded exchanges, while the other ended in a finish. For that reason, the 47.5 figure works best as a descriptive snapshot rather than a standalone ranking.
Averages describe the available sample; they do not replace round-by-round analysis. Always pair the number with the opponent, date, result, and fight-ending circumstances.
Quick reference and research checklist
For readers tracking Carli Judice’s statistics, the table below provides the most useful figures from the available 2026 entries.
| Reference item | Value |
|---|---|
| Listed fights analyzed | 2 |
| Wins in listed sample | 2 |
| Significant strikes landed | 95 |
| Significant strikes attempted | 220 |
| Average significant strikes landed | 47.5 per listed fight |
| Average significant strikes attempted | 110 per listed fight |
| Combined significant-strike accuracy | 43.18% |
| Listed knockdowns | 1 |
Research Checklist:
- Confirm whether the statistic is landed strikes or attempted strikes
- Separate the two detailed 2026 fight rows before calculating
- Use 47.5 as the listed-fight landed average
- Use 43.18% for combined accuracy across 220 attempts
- Check knockdowns and finish timing before comparing performances
The public ESPN profile also lists Judice as a women’s flyweight from the United States, representing Headkicks MMA, with the nickname “Crispy” and a southpaw stance. Those profile details help identify the correct fighter, but they do not change the significant-strike calculation.
For the underlying figures, consult the Carli Judice MMA Career Stats page on ESPN. For the post-fight sequence and Judice’s comments about the Chaves finish, the Carli Judice Octagon Interview at UFC 318 provides additional context.
When a statistic appears in a search result, check whether it represents a career total, a recent-fight table, or a single-bout figure before quoting it.
Frequently asked questions
Q: What is Carli Judice average significant strikes?
Across the two detailed 2026 fights shown in the available striking table, Carli Judice landed 95 significant strikes, averaging 47.5 per listed fight.
Q: What is Carli Judice’s significant-strike accuracy in the listed sample?
She landed 95 of 220 significant-strike attempts, producing a combined accuracy rate of 43.18%. The individual listed figures are 42.70% against Juliana Miller and 45.71% against Jeisla Chaves.
Q: Why did the Chaves fight have fewer significant strikes?
The Chaves bout ended at 1:30 of round three after a stoppage sequence involving knees and a liver shot. Its shorter action window limited the final strike total.
Q: Is 47.5 a full career average for Carli Judice?
No. It is the simple average from the two detailed 2026 fight rows available in the striking table. The displayed profile lists a 7-2-0 overall record, but the provided detailed rows do not cover every career bout.
The clearest summary is 47.5 significant strikes landed per listed 2026 fight, supported by 95 total landed strikes from 220 attempts.