- Carli Judice significant strikes: Her listed career rate is 9.32 landed per minute.
- Striking accuracy: The available UFCStats profile lists 50% significant-strike accuracy.
- Defensive rate: Judice is listed with 57% significant-strike defense.
- Documented totals: The supplied fight rows list 16 strikes against Jeisla Chaves and 79 against Juliana Miller.
- Context: Fight totals and career averages measure different parts of a fighter’s performance.
Carli Judice significant strikes: Career Metrics
The clearest snapshot of Carli Judice’s striking profile comes from her UFCStats career statistics. The profile lists a 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute rate, alongside 50% striking accuracy, 6.62 significant strikes absorbed per minute, and 57% striking defense.
These numbers should be read together rather than treated as isolated rankings. The landed-per-minute figure reflects offensive activity, while absorbed-per-minute describes the amount of significant striking pressure Judice takes. Accuracy indicates how often her significant-strike attempts land, and defense measures the percentage of opponent strikes that do not land.
Offensive Pace
9.32 SLpM indicates Judice’s listed rate of significant strikes landed per minute.
Accuracy
50% Str. Acc. places the focus on efficient connections rather than volume alone.
Absorption
6.62 SApM reflects the significant strikes listed as absorbed per minute.
Defense
57% Str. Def. represents the percentage of opponent significant strikes that did not land.
| Metric | Listed figure | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| Significant Strikes Landed per Minute | 9.32 | Offensive striking pace |
| Significant Striking Accuracy | 50% | Share of significant-strike attempts that land |
| Significant Strikes Absorbed per Minute | 6.62 | Defensive workload and incoming pressure |
| Significant Strike Defense | 57% | Share of opponent significant strikes avoided |
A high striking pace does not automatically describe fight control. Pair volume with accuracy, defense, round length, and the opponent’s activity.
The same UFCStats profile lists Judice at 7-2-0, with a southpaw stance, a listed height of 5 feet 7 inches, a 68-inch reach, and a 115-pound weight. Those physical details provide useful context for reviewing her striking numbers, but they do not replace the actual bout statistics.
Documented Fight Totals and Significant Strikes
The supplied UFCStats data includes two documented victories from 2026. One is a first-round KO/TKO win over Jeisla Chaves at UFC Fight Night: Hernandez vs. Rodrigues on August 22, 2026. The other is a unanimous-decision win over Juliana Miller at UFC Fight Night: Strickland vs. Hernandez on February 21, 2026.
The extracted fight table places two fighter values together in several columns. In the listed “Str” field, Judice’s value appears first and the opponent’s value second. Using that format, Judice is shown with 16 significant strikes against Chaves and 79 against Miller.
| Opponent | Event date | Result | Method | Round and time | Listed Str field |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeisla Chaves | August 22, 2026 | Win | KO/TKO, kick | Round 1, 1:39 | 16 for Judice, 10 for Chaves |
| Juliana Miller | February 21, 2026 | Win | Unanimous decision | Round 3, 5:00 | 79 for Judice, 36 for Miller |
The two bouts show why raw totals need fight-length context. The Chaves bout ended at 1:39 of the opening round, while the Miller bout reached the end of the third round. A longer fight gives a fighter more time to accumulate strikes, so the 79-strike total against Miller should not be compared directly with the 16-strike total against Chaves without considering duration.
Confirm the fight length
Start with the official result, round, and stoppage time. A first-round finish and a full three-round decision create very different opportunities for strike accumulation.
Identify the fighter order
Check whether the stat row lists Judice first and her opponent second. The supplied table compresses the two fighter values into one row.
Read the striking column
Use the “Str” field to locate the listed significant-strike total for Judice. The documented values are 16 against Chaves and 79 against Miller.
Add tactical context
Compare the total with the result method, fight duration, takedown figures, and defensive numbers before drawing conclusions.
The supplied table extraction does not preserve every original UFCStats label or separate every fighter value into its own cell. Treat the listed numbers as documented summary values, not as a substitute for a full round-by-round breakdown.
How to Analyze Judice’s Striking Profile
A useful analysis of Carli Judice’s significant strikes should combine activity, efficiency, and resistance. Her listed 9.32 SLpM suggests an active offensive pace, while the 50% accuracy figure indicates that volume is paired with a clear rate of successful connections.
The 6.62 SApM figure shows that Judice also operates in exchanges where opponents land significant offense. Her 57% defense provides a second layer of context: she avoids more than half of the significant strikes counted against her, but the profile does not support describing her as untouchable or mistake-free.
| Question | Relevant statistic | Practical interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| How active is Judice offensively? | 9.32 SLpM | Measures significant strikes landed per minute |
| How efficiently does she connect? | 50% accuracy | Helps separate clean offense from attempted volume |
| How much incoming offense does she face? | 6.62 SApM | Shows the significant-strike pressure listed against her |
| How often does she avoid strikes? | 57% defense | Indicates the share of opponent significant strikes that miss |
Volume Lens
Use SLpM to evaluate how frequently Judice lands significant strikes during active fight time.
Efficiency Lens
Use accuracy to ask whether her output is supported by clean, effective connections.
Defense Lens
Use SApM and defense together to judge how much offense she allows while exchanging.
The documented fight totals also show a difference between a quick finish and a decision win. Against Chaves, the available row records a compact striking total before the kick stoppage. Against Miller, the row records a much larger total over three completed rounds. This makes Miller the more useful example for reviewing sustained output, while Chaves provides context for early-finish efficiency.
The profile also lists a 0.52 takedown average, 25% takedown accuracy, 80% takedown defense, and 0.0 submission average. These are not significant-strike statistics, but they can affect how striking exchanges develop. A strong takedown-defense figure may help a fighter keep contests in striking range, while wrestling attempts can change the pace and distance of a bout.
Use the striking figures to describe tendencies, not to assign a complete fighting style. A career summary cannot show stance switches, target selection, round momentum, or the quality of each exchange.
Best Way to Track Future Updates
Fight statistics can change as new contests are added to a career profile. For a reliable Carli Judice significant strikes update, record the event date, opponent, result, method, duration, and the relevant striking totals in the same format each time.
The UFCStats fighter profile is the primary reference for the figures covered here: Carli Judice’s UFCStats record and career statistics. The page lists the career metrics and the documented fight rows used in this guide.
| Update field | Why it matters | Example from the supplied data |
|---|---|---|
| Opponent | Identifies the matchup | Jeisla Chaves or Juliana Miller |
| Event date | Preserves the timeline | August 22, 2026 |
| Result and method | Adds finish context | KO/TKO or unanimous decision |
| Round and time | Measures available fight time | Round 1 at 1:39 or Round 3 at 5:00 |
| Striking total | Tracks documented output | 16 or 79 listed for Judice |
Significant-Strikes Review Checklist:
- Confirm the opponent and event date
- Record the result, method, round, and time
- Separate Judice’s value from the opponent’s value
- Compare total strikes with fight duration
- Recheck career averages after each new documented bout
When reviewing a new entry, avoid combining a single-fight total with a career-per-minute average. The former describes one contest, while the latter summarizes activity across the profile’s recorded career sample. Both are useful, but they answer different questions.
Keep one table for individual fights and one separate table for career averages. This prevents short-fight totals from being mistaken for season-wide or career-wide rates.
Carli Judice Significant Strikes FAQ
The available statistics support a focused review of Judice’s striking production, but they should be interpreted within the limitations of summary data. The questions below address the most important distinctions.
Q: What is Carli Judice’s listed significant strikes landed per minute rate?
The supplied UFCStats profile lists Carli Judice at 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute, abbreviated as SLpM.
Q: What significant-strike totals are documented for Judice in 2026?
The supplied fight rows list 16 strikes for Judice against Jeisla Chaves and 79 against Juliana Miller. The table presents Judice’s value first and the opponent’s value second.
Q: Why is the Miller total higher than the Chaves total?
The Miller bout reached the end of the third round, while the Chaves fight ended at 1:39 of round one. More completed fight time creates more opportunities to accumulate strikes.
Q: What are Judice’s listed striking accuracy and defense rates?
Her profile lists 50% significant striking accuracy and 57% significant strike defense. Accuracy measures her successful connections, while defense measures opponent strikes that did not land.
The most useful summary is balanced: Judice is listed with active significant-strike output, 50% accuracy, 57% defense, and documented 2026 totals that must be read alongside fight duration.