- Carli Judice takedown defense is listed at 80% in the available UFC statistics.
- Defensive context includes a 57% significant-strike defense rate and a southpaw stance.
- Offensive balance comes from 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute.
- Study focus should include cage positioning, first-contact reactions, and exit discipline.
- Record snapshot: UFCStats lists Judice at 7-2-0 on the referenced profile.
Carli Judice Takedown Defense at a Glance
Carli Judice’s takedown defense stands out as the clearest grappling statistic in the available profile. UFCStats lists her at 80% TD defense, meaning opponents’ recorded takedown attempts failed to land at a high rate in the available sample. That number should be read alongside her 0.52 takedowns landed per 15 minutes, 25% takedown accuracy, and 0.0 submissions attempted per 15 minutes.
The profile also lists Judice at 115 pounds, 5 feet 7 inches tall, with a 68-inch reach and a southpaw stance. These physical details help frame how she may approach defensive exchanges, but a percentage alone cannot describe every scramble, clinch sequence, or defensive decision.
| Metric | Listed value | Practical reading |
|---|---|---|
| TD defense | 80% | Strong recorded resistance to opponent takedown attempts |
| TD average | 0.52 | Some offensive takedown production over 15 minutes |
| TD accuracy | 25% | Selective or inconsistent success on recorded attempts |
| Significant strikes landed | 9.32 per minute | High-volume striking output in the profile |
| Significant-strike defense | 57% | Moderate recorded avoidance of significant strikes |
Use 80% as a valuable statistical anchor, not a promise that every future takedown attempt will fail. Opponent style, cage position, timing, and sample size still matter.
The referenced Carli Judice UFCStats profile also records two 2026 results: a first-round KO/TKO win over Jeisla Chaves at 1:39 and a unanimous-decision win over Juliana Miller after three rounds. The listed bout rows show no completed takedowns for Judice in either contest, while the Miller fight includes two takedowns for the opponent in the summary.
What Makes the Defensive Profile Useful
A strong takedown-defense percentage is most useful when it is connected to the rest of a fighter’s style. Judice’s southpaw stance and high listed striking output create a clear strategic question: can she keep the fight in open space long enough to make her striking volume matter?
The answer depends on more than sprawls. Effective takedown defense can include early hand fighting, underhooks, hip pressure, frame placement, whizzer control, boundary awareness, and intelligent resets after a failed attempt.
First Contact
- Hands first
- Disrupt the entry before the attacker reaches the hips
- Maintain posture while defending
Cage Defense
- Create an angle
- Avoid standing square against the fence
- Use frames and underhooks to turn out
Post-Attempt Reset
- Return to stance
- Separate safely after the shot fails
- Rebuild striking range without rushing
| Defensive phase | Main objective | Common mistake to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Before the shot | Read level changes and manage distance | Reaching with both hands |
| On entry | Block the hips and widen the base | Giving up chest-to-chest posture |
| At the fence | Turn the corner and recover underhooks | Remaining flat against the cage |
| After the attempt | Separate or scramble with balance | Throwing immediately while off-balance |
An 80% figure does not identify whether every defense came from a sprawl, a cage escape, a counter, or an opponent’s failed setup. Review the exchange itself before assigning a specific technique.
For fight study, prioritize the moment just before contact. A takedown often becomes easier to defend when the defender recognizes the setup rather than waiting for the opponent to connect both hands. Judice’s striking volume may also encourage opponents to shoot underneath combinations, so the final punch, kick, or exit step deserves close attention.
Step-by-Step Takedown Defense Study
Use this process to analyze Judice’s defensive habits without treating isolated statistics as a full scouting report. The goal is to identify repeatable patterns across distance, entries, clinches, and resets.
Mark the Starting Range
Record whether the opponent shoots from open space, after a combination, during a kick exchange, or from the fence. Range explains why the attempt became available.
Identify the First Defensive Contact
Note the first meaningful reaction: head position, frames, underhooks, hip pressure, sprawl, or a quick retreat. The earliest reaction often determines the rest of the sequence.
Track the Boundary
Check whether Judice stays centered, reaches the fence, turns off the cage, or gives up a prolonged clinch. Position can matter as much as the initial technique.
Measure the Reset
After the attempt ends, observe whether she returns to stance, circles away, counters, or accepts another exchange. A successful defense should lead to a stable next position.
| Review question | Strong sign | Risk sign |
|---|---|---|
| Did the shot reach the hips? | Early frame or underhook stops connection | Opponent locks hands quickly |
| Where did the defense occur? | Open space or an angled fence position | Flat back against the cage |
| What happened after separation? | Balanced stance and controlled exit | Immediate exchange while upright posture is lost |
| Was the attempt repeated? | Opponent changes approach | Same entry succeeds on later attempts |
A practical study session should separate attempts, completed takedowns, and extended control. These are not interchangeable. A fighter can stop the initial shot but still spend time defending a body lock, or deny a takedown while conceding a damaging clinch position.
Log every defensive exchange with the same categories: setup, first contact, boundary, result, and reset. Consistent notes reveal patterns more reliably than highlight clips.
The available profile lists two takedowns for Juliana Miller in the summarized 2026 decision, so the most useful comparison is not simply “defense succeeded” or “defense failed.” Examine when those takedowns occurred, whether they followed earlier pressure, and how Judice responded afterward.
Matchup Applications and Training Priorities
The profile suggests a fighter whose defensive value should be considered together with striking pace. Judice is listed at 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute, while her opponents are listed at 6.62 significant strikes absorbed per minute against her profile. That combination makes defensive transitions especially important: every stopped entry can preserve the distance needed for her offense.
A responsible scouting plan should avoid inventing technical details that are not documented. Instead, use the available data to set priorities for film review and preparation.
| Opponent approach | Key defensive priority | Follow-up objective |
|---|---|---|
| Long-range shot | Keep hips back and deny clean connection | Re-establish striking distance |
| Shot after a combination | Finish the combination with balance | Exit on an angle, not straight back |
| Fence pressure | Win inside position and turn | Return to the center |
| Repeated clinch entries | Improve hand fighting and frames | Make the opponent pay for failed attempts |
Carli Judice Defense Review:
- Confirm the opponent's entry distance before judging the defense
- Separate stopped attempts from completed takedowns
- Track cage position and the quality of each reset
- Compare defensive exchanges with Judice's striking output
- Use the UFCStats profile as a reference point, not a complete technical breakdown
For training analysis, the most transferable priorities are:
- Balance after striking: Keep the feet underneath the hips when finishing combinations.
- Underhook awareness: Treat the first clinch connection as a defensive decision point.
- Cage movement: Turn before the opponent settles into a strong body lock.
- Controlled counters: Counter only after posture and hand position are recovered.
- Repeatable logging: Record the same details for every takedown attempt.
The available statistics provide measurements and bout summaries, but they do not document every defensive technique. Keep technical conclusions tied to observable exchanges.
UFCStats lists Judice’s stance as southpaw, which can influence the angle of both striking exchanges and takedown entries. Southpaw-versus-orthodox matchups may create open-side movement patterns, but stance alone does not determine the outcome. The opponent’s lead hand, preferred shot direction, and cage-cutting habits remain essential variables.
FAQ: Carli Judice Takedown Defense
The following answers summarize the available statistical profile while keeping the interpretation measured. For the latest official record details, consult the linked UFCStats page and future bout records as they become available.
Q: What is Carli Judice's listed takedown defense?
The referenced UFCStats profile lists Carli Judice at 80% takedown defense. This represents the percentage of recorded opponent takedown attempts that did not land in the available statistics.
Q: Does an 80% defense rate mean Judice cannot be taken down?
No. It is a strong recorded rate, but outcomes can change with opponent quality, cage position, timing, repeated attempts, and the specific sample being measured.
Q: What other statistics help explain her defensive style?
The profile lists a southpaw stance, 57% significant-strike defense, 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute, 0.52 takedowns per 15 minutes, and 25% takedown accuracy.
Q: How should fans study Carli Judice takedown defense?
Review each entry by setup, first contact, boundary position, final result, and reset. This method distinguishes early shot denial from later clinch or scramble outcomes.
The clearest conclusion is that Judice has a strong recorded takedown-defense statistic, and her defensive value should be judged alongside her striking pace, stance, and positional choices.