Carli Judice ufc stats: Record, Metrics & Fight Guide

Carli Judice is an MMA fighter whose available UFCStats profile provides a compact view of her record, physical measurements, stance, striking rate, and wrestling defense. The current profile lists a 7-2-0 record and identifies her as a southpaw competing at the 115-pound weight listed on the page.

The numbers point toward an aggressive striker with meaningful defensive wrestling. Her 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute is the most notable offensive statistic in the profile, while her 80% takedown defense is the clearest defensive marker. Together, those figures help explain why her best performances can develop when she maintains range and keeps exchanges on the feet.

Video Highlights:

• Carli Judice is framed as a power striker who prefers standing exchanges.
• Her matchup path emphasizes forward pressure and early finishing opportunities.
• Opponents can change the fight by closing distance and forcing grappling exchanges.
• The matchup breakdown identifies the first round as an important finishing window.

The following table separates confirmed profile data from interpretation. This distinction matters because a rate statistic describes a tendency, not a guaranteed result in every bout.

The available measurements create a straightforward scouting baseline:

• Southpaw stance: Her left-handed stance can shape the angle of exchanges and the direction of defensive movement.
• High striking activity: The 9.32 significant strikes landed per minute figure suggests a high-output approach.
• Balanced striking accuracy: A 50% accuracy rate indicates that output should be evaluated alongside shot selection and opponent quality.
• Wrestling resistance: An 80% takedown defense rate is a major part of her statistical identity.
• Limited submission activity: The listed submission average is 0.0, making grappling control less central to the recorded profile.

Judice’s striking statistics are built around volume. Landing 9.32 significant strikes per minute places activity at the center of her profile, while 50% accuracy suggests that she is not simply relying on single-shot power. The more useful reading is that she creates offense through repeated attempts, pressure, and exchanges.

The available matchup analysis describes her as a power striker and aggressive slugger. That assessment fits the statistical profile, but it should be applied carefully. A pressure style can be effective when Judice controls distance, forces reactions, and makes opponents exchange before they can establish clinch or ground positions.

Her striking profile has four useful coaching implications:

1. Pressure should be structured. Moving forward is most effective when paired with exits, angle changes, and awareness of the counter.
2. Output must serve positioning. High volume is more valuable when it keeps opponents from safely closing distance.
3. Defense remains part of the offense. A 57% striking defense rate supports active exchanges, but the 6.62 absorbed-per-minute figure shows that she also takes offense in return.
4. Early opportunities matter. The recent first-round finish demonstrates that her offense can produce a quick result when the exchange develops in her favor.

The strongest version of Judice’s stand-up game is therefore not just “throw more.” It is pressure with enough range control to make the opponent fight on her preferred terms. Against a grappler, that means managing the space before the opponent reaches the clinch. Against another striker, it means winning the rhythm without allowing exchanges to become unnecessarily chaotic.

A simple comparison of offensive and defensive rates helps frame the tradeoff:

The most important defensive number in the profile is 80% takedown defense. That figure suggests Judice has been able to stop a substantial share of recorded takedown attempts, a valuable asset for a fighter whose strongest phase is described as standing exchanges.

Her offensive wrestling numbers are more modest: 0.52 takedowns landed per 15 minutes and 25% takedown accuracy. The profile also lists 0.0 submission attempts per 15 minutes. These numbers do not mean she cannot grapple; they indicate that her recorded statistical identity is much more focused on striking than on submission hunting or sustained takedown offense.

The Juliana Miller result is especially useful for understanding the matchup dynamic. The listed fight row records a unanimous decision after three rounds, with Judice credited with 79 significant strikes and Miller credited with 36. Miller is also credited with two takedowns in that row. This suggests Judice was able to maintain enough striking activity to win the decision despite facing some grappling pressure.

The practical game plan for opponents is clear:

• Close distance behind feints rather than entering from too far away.
• Force Judice to defend repeatedly instead of relying on one takedown attempt.
• Use clinch pressure to reduce the space available for her power shots.
• Avoid giving her extended open-floor exchanges where volume can accumulate.
• Make every defensive reset lead into another positional attack.

For Judice, the priorities are equally direct:

• Keep a stable base when throwing combinations.
• Defend the first takedown attempt without giving up the back.
• Separate from the clinch before opponents can chain attacks.
• Stand up efficiently if grounded instead of accepting prolonged control.
• Preserve enough energy to defend late-round entries.

The available fight-history rows show two 2026 results. On August 22, 2026, Judice is listed as defeating Jeisla Chaves by first-round KO/TKO at 1:39, with one knockdown and 16 significant strikes landed in the row. On February 21, 2026, she is listed as defeating Juliana Miller by unanimous decision after three rounds, with a 5:00 time in round three.

These results show two different paths to victory: an early finish and a decision earned over a full three-round distance.

The two performances should be read together:

• Finishing upside: The Chaves result confirms that Judice can end a fight early when her offense lands decisively.
• Decision durability: The Miller result shows that her approach can also produce a win over three rounds.
• Striking consistency: The Miller row lists 79 significant strikes, supporting the profile’s high-output identity.
• Grappling adaptation: Miller’s two listed takedowns show that Judice’s path is not limited to uncontested stand-up exchanges.
• Context matters: Two recent rows are useful indicators, but they do not replace a complete fight-by-fight breakdown.

When evaluating a future matchup, use this order:

1. Identify the opponent’s preferred phase. A striker may create a pace battle, while a grappler may target clinches and takedown chains.
2. Compare defensive priorities. Judice’s 80% takedown defense becomes more important against opponents who depend on control.
3. Check the likely fight length. Her recent results include both a 1:39 finish and a full three-round decision.
4. Review the statistical tradeoff. High output can win minutes, but absorbed strikes and defensive workload should remain part of the analysis.

The clearest summary is that Judice’s statistical identity combines high striking activity with strong takedown defense. Her recent 2026 results add both a quick knockout and a decision win, showing that she can succeed through different fight lengths. The main matchup question is whether she can keep exchanges in the space where her volume and power are most effective.